Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) Scores to Detect Self-Reported Dysphagia in Brazilians.

The Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) detects swallowing impairments (dysphagia) self-reported by patients according to their perception. This noninvasive, inexpensive, self-administered instrument is quickly and easily filled out. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the scores, sensitivity, and specificity of the method to define self-reported dysphagia in Brazilians. EAT-10 scores were evaluated in 443 healthy individuals (273 women and 170 men), aged 20 to 84 years, with no swallowing difficulties or diseases, and 72 patients with diseases that cause dysphagia (35 women and 37 men), aged 29 to 88 years. Each of the 10 instrument items has a 0-4 rating scale, in which 0 indicates no problem and 4, a severe problem; total results range from 0 to 40. The median EAT-10 score of healthy subjects was 0 (range: 0-20), and that of patients was 14.5 (range: 1-40). Considering a ≥ 3 cutoff score to define dysphagia risk, it was self-reported by 97.2% of patients with dysphagia and 9.5% of no-disease individuals (97.2% sensitivity and 90.7% specificity). The positive predictive value of the test was 63% and the negative predictive value was 99.5%. Healthy women had higher scores (median 0, range: 0-20) than healthy men (median 0, range: 0-8, p < 0.01) and more results indicative of self-reported dysphagia (11.7%) than healthy men (5.9%). The EAT-10 cutoff score to detect self-reported dysphagia in Brazilians should be 3, as previously considered. Healthy women complain more of self-reported dysphagia than healthy men. The test has high sensitivity and specificity.

Prevalence of non-obstructive dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation.

OBJECTIVE: Heartburn and regurgitation are the most common gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, and dysphagia could be a possible symptom. This investigation aimed to evaluate the prevalence of non-obstructive dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation. METHODS: A total of 147 patients (age, 20-70 years; women, 72%) complaining of heartburn and regurgitation, without esophageal stricture, previous esophageal surgery, or other diseases, were evaluated. Twenty-seven patients had esophagitis. The Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) was employed to screen for dysphagia; EAT-10 is composed of 10 items, and the patients rate each item from 0 to 4 (0, no problems; 4, most severe symptom). Results of the 147 patients were compared with those of 417 healthy volunteers (women, 62%; control group) aged 20-68 years. RESULTS: In the control group, only two (0.5%) had an EAT-10 score ≥5, which was chosen as the threshold to define dysphagia. EAT-10 scores ≥5 were found in 71 (48.3%) patients and in 55% of the patients with esophagitis and 47% of the patients without esophagitis. This finding indicates a relatively higher prevalence of perceived dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation and in patients with esophagitis. We also found a positive correlation between EAT-10 scores and the severity of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms based on the Velanovich scale. CONCLUSION: In patients with heartburn and regurgitation symptoms, the prevalence of dysphagia was at least 48%, and has a positive correlation with the overall symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux.

Prevalence of non-obstructive dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation

OBJECTIVE: Heartburn and regurgitation are the most common gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, and dysphagia could be a possible symptom. This investigation aimed to evaluate the prevalence of non-obstructive dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation. METHODS: A total of 147 patients (age, 20-70 years; women, 72%) complaining of heartburn and regurgitation, without esophageal stricture, previous esophageal surgery, or other diseases, were evaluated. Twenty-seven patients had esophagitis. The Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) was employed to screen for dysphagia; EAT-10 is composed of 10 items, and the patients rate each item from 0 to 4 (0, no problems; 4, most severe symptom). Results of the 147 patients were compared with those of 417 healthy volunteers (women, 62%; control group) aged 20-68 years. RESULTS: In the control group, only two (0.5%) had an EAT-10 score ≥5, which was chosen as the threshold to define dysphagia. EAT-10 scores ≥5 were found in 71 (48.3%) patients and in 55% of the patients with esophagitis and 47% of the patients without esophagitis. This finding indicates a relatively higher prevalence of perceived dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation and in patients with esophagitis. We also found a positive correlation between EAT-10 scores and the severity of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms based on the Velanovich scale. CONCLUSION: In patients with heartburn and regurgitation symptoms, the prevalence of dysphagia was at least 48%, and has a positive correlation with the overall symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux.

Medication swallowing difficulties in people without dysphagia / Dificuldade de deglutição de medicamentos em pessoas sem disfagia

ABSTRACT Objective: to assess the difficulty in swallowing medications and correlate it with age and gender in healthy adults and elderly. Methods: a total of 439 asymptomatic healthy volunteers (270 females and 169 males), who were not taking any medication on a regular basis, aged from 20 to 84 years, were questioned as for dysphagia, by using the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Question number five of the EAT-10, specifically, approached the difficulty in swallowing drugs, considering zero as "no swallowing problem" and 1 to 4 as "some degree of difficulty" (4 as great difficulty).The chi-square test (x2) was used for the statistical analysis. Results: a total of 365 (83%) volunteers reported having no difficulty in swallowing medications (89% of men and 80% of women), whereas 74 (17%) reported some degree of difficulty (11% of men and 20% of women)(p = 0.01). These represented 20% of those aged between 20 and 49, and 9% of those aged 50 and over (p = 0.02). Conclusion: in this study, it was observed that both age and gender influence on medication swallowing, a difficulty more frequent among women and young adults. Some degree of difficulty was reported by 17% of the volunteers.

RESUMO Objetivo: analisar dificuldade de deglutição de medicamentos e a relacionar com idade e gênero de adultos e idosos saudáveis. Métodos: por meio do instrumento EAT-10, traduzido para o português, foram avaliados, quanto à ocorrência de disfagia,439 voluntários (270 mulheres e 169 homens) com idades entre 20 e 84 anos sem doenças, sem sintomas, e que não ingeriam medicamentos regularmente. A questão de número cinco do EAT-10, especificamente, questionou sobre a dificuldade de deglutição de medicamentos, considerando zero como ausência de dificuldade e 1 a 4 como algum grau de dificuldade (4 como dificuldade intensa). Para análise estatística foi utilizado o teste qui-quadrado (x(2)). Resultados: trezentos e sessenta e cinco (83%) voluntários referiram não apresentar dificuldades para ingerir medicamentos (89% dos homens e 80% das mulheres),e 74 (17%) relataram algum grau de dificuldade,11% dos homens e 20% das mulheres (p=0,01), 20% daqueles com idades entre 20 e 49 anos e 9% daqueles com idades iguais ou acima de 50 anos (p=0,02). Conclusão: neste trabalho foi observado que idade e gênero têm influência na dificuldade de deglutição de medicamentos, a qual é mais freqüente em mulheres e nos adultos jovens. Algum grau de dificuldade foi referido por 17% dos voluntários.

Dinâmica da ingestão de água em pacientes com acalasia: influência de sexo e idade / Water ingestion dynamics in patients with achalasia: influence of sex and age

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Achalasia is a disease that affects esophageal bolus transit due to the absence of esophageal peristaltic contractions and impaired or absent relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was: a) to evaluate the dynamics of water ingestion in patients with achalasia, idiopathic or caused by Chagas' disease; b) to evaluate the influence of sex and age on water ingestion dynamics. METHODS: The investigation was conducted with 79 patients with achalasia (27 idiopathic and 52 Chagas' disease) and 91 healthy volunteers, all evaluated by the water-drinking test. The individuals drank, in triplicate, 50 mL of water without interruption. The time and the number of swallows for this task were counted. We also measured: (a) inter-swallow interval - the time to complete the task, divided by the number of swallows during the task; (b) swallowing rate - volume drunk divided by the time; (c) volume per swallow - volume drunk divided by the number of swallows. RESULTS: Patients with achalasia took longer to ingest all the volume (mean 12.2 seconds) than healthy controls (mean 5.4 seconds), had greater number of swallows, longer interval between swallows, lower swallowing rate (5.2 mL/s vs 10.9 mL/s in controls) and lower volume per swallow (9.1 mL vs 14.4 mL in controls, P<0.01). Among healthy volunteers, women had a shorter interval between swallows and lower volume per swallow compared with men, and in the achalasia group, women had a longer interval between swallows and lower ingestion rate. No difference in the drinking test results was found between younger and older subjects in achalasia or control group. Also, no differences were observed between patients with Chagas' disease and those with idiopathic achalasia, or between patients with increased and normal esophageal diameter. CONCLUSION: Patients with achalasia have difficulty in ingesting water, taking a longer time to complete the task, which is influenced by sex but not by age or severity of the disease.

RESUMO CONTEXTO: Acalásia é uma doença que causa dificuldade no transporte do bolo deglutido da boca ao estômago, consequente à ausência das contrações peristálticas no esôfago e relaxamento parcial ou ausente do esfíncter inferior do esôfago. OBJETIVO: O objetivo desta investigação foi: a) avaliar a dinâmica da ingestão de água em pacientes com acalásia, idiopática ou causada pela doença de Chagas; b) avaliar a influência do sexo e da idade na dinâmica da ingestão de água. MÉTODOS: A investigação foi realizada em 79 pacientes com acalásia (27 idiopática e 52 Chagas) e 91 voluntários saudáveis, todos avaliados pelo teste de ingestão de água. Os indivíduos ingeriam, em triplicata e sem pausas, 50 mL de água, a ingestão era cronometrada e o número de deglutições contadas. Também foram medidos: (a) intervalo entre deglutições - tempo para completar a tarefa, dividido pelo número de deglutições durante a tarefa; (b) fluxo de deglutição - volume ingerido dividido pelo tempo de ingestão; (c) volume de cada deglutição - volume ingerido dividido pelo número de deglutições. RESULTADOS: Os pacientes com acalásia levaram mais tempo (média 12,2 segundos) para ingerir todo o volume que voluntários sadios (5,4 segundos), e apresentaram maior número de deglutições, intervalo mais longo entre as deglutições, menor fluxo de deglutição (5,2 mL/s vs 10,9 mL/s, nos controles) e menor volume em cada deglutição (9,1 mL vs 14,4 mL nos controles). Entre os voluntários saudáveis, as mulheres tiveram um intervalo entre deglutições mais curto e menor volume em cada deglutição em comparação aos homens e, na acalásia, as mulheres tiveram um intervalo mais longo entre as deglutições e menor fluxo de ingestão. Não houve diferenças significativas entre indivíduos mais jovens e mais velhos, entre os voluntários saudáveis e entre os indivíduos com acalásia. Não houve diferenças entre pacientes com doença de Chagas e pacientes com acalasia idiopática, ou entre pacientes com aumento ou não no diâmetro esofágico. CONCLUSÃO: Pacientes com acalásia têm dificuldade em ingerir água, levando mais tempo para completar a tarefa, que é influenciada pelo sexo dos indivíduos, mas não pela idade ou dilatação do esôfago.

WATER INGESTION DYNAMICS IN PATIENTS WITH ACHALASIA: INFLUENCE OF SEX AND AGE.

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is a disease that affects esophageal bolus transit due to the absence of esophageal peristaltic contractions and impaired or absent relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was: a) to evaluate the dynamics of water ingestion in patients with achalasia, idiopathic or caused by Chagas' disease; b) to evaluate the influence of sex and age on water ingestion dynamics. METHODS: The investigation was conducted with 79 patients with achalasia (27 idiopathic and 52 Chagas' disease) and 91 healthy volunteers, all evaluated by the water-drinking test. The individuals drank, in triplicate, 50 mL of water without interruption. The time and the number of swallows for this task were counted. We also measured: (a) inter-swallow interval - the time to complete the task, divided by the number of swallows during the task; (b) swallowing rate - volume drunk divided by the time; (c) volume per swallow - volume drunk divided by the number of swallows. RESULTS: Patients with achalasia took longer to ingest all the volume (mean 12.2 seconds) than healthy controls (mean 5.4 seconds), had greater number of swallows, longer interval between swallows, lower swallowing rate (5.2 mL/s vs 10.9 mL/s in controls) and lower volume per swallow (9.1 mL vs 14.4 mL in controls, P<0.01). Among healthy volunteers, women had a shorter interval between swallows and lower volume per swallow compared with men, and in the achalasia group, women had a longer interval between swallows and lower ingestion rate. No difference in the drinking test results was found between younger and older subjects in achalasia or control group. Also, no differences were observed between patients with Chagas' disease and those with idiopathic achalasia, or between patients with increased and normal esophageal diameter. CONCLUSION: Patients with achalasia have difficulty in ingesting water, taking a longer time to complete the task, which is influenced by sex but not by age or severity of the disease.

POSTFUNDOPLICATION DYSPHAGIA CAUSES SIMILAR WATER INGESTION DYNAMICS AS ACHALASIA.

BACKGROUND: - After surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease dysphagia is a symptom in the majority of patients, with decrease in intensity over time. However, some patients may have persistent dysphagia. OBJECTIVE: - The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the dynamics of water ingestion in patients with postfundoplication dysphagia compared with patients with dysphagia caused by achalasia, idiopathic or consequent to Chagas' disease, and controls. METHODS: - Thirty-three patients with postfundoplication dysphagia, assessed more than one year after surgery, together with 50 patients with Chagas' disease, 27 patients with idiopathic achalasia and 88 controls were all evaluated by the water swallow test. They drunk, in triplicate, 50 mL of water without breaks while being precisely timed and the number of swallows counted. Also measured was: (a) inter-swallows interval - the time to complete the task, divided by the number of swallows during the task; (b) swallowing flow - volume drunk divided by the time taken; (c) volume of each swallow - volume drunk divided by the number of swallows. RESULTS: - Patients with postfundoplication dysphagia, Chagas' disease and idiopathic achalasia took longer to ingest all the volume, had an increased number of swallows, an increase in interval between swallows, a decrease in swallowing flow and a decrease in water volume of each swallow compared with the controls. There was no difference between the three groups of patients. There was no correlation between postfundoplication time and the results. CONCLUSION: - It was concluded that patients with postfundoplication dysphagia have similar water ingestion dynamics as patients with achalasia.

Postfundoplication dysphagia causes similar water ingestion dynamics as achalasia

ABSTRACT Background - After surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease dysphagia is a symptom in the majority of patients, with decrease in intensity over time. However, some patients may have persistent dysphagia. Objective - The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the dynamics of water ingestion in patients with postfundoplication dysphagia compared with patients with dysphagia caused by achalasia, idiopathic or consequent to Chagas' disease, and controls. Methods - Thirty-three patients with postfundoplication dysphagia, assessed more than one year after surgery, together with 50 patients with Chagas' disease, 27 patients with idiopathic achalasia and 88 controls were all evaluated by the water swallow test. They drunk, in triplicate, 50 mL of water without breaks while being precisely timed and the number of swallows counted. Also measured was: (a) inter-swallows interval - the time to complete the task, divided by the number of swallows during the task; (b) swallowing flow - volume drunk divided by the time taken; (c) volume of each swallow - volume drunk divided by the number of swallows. Results - Patients with postfundoplication dysphagia, Chagas' disease and idiopathic achalasia took longer to ingest all the volume, had an increased number of swallows, an increase in interval between swallows, a decrease in swallowing flow and a decrease in water volume of each swallow compared with the controls. There was no difference between the three groups of patients. There was no correlation between postfundoplication time and the results. Conclusion - It was concluded that patients with postfundoplication dysphagia have similar water ingestion dynamics as patients with achalasia.

RESUMO Contexto - Após o tratamento cirúrgico da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico, disfagia é um sintoma presente na maioria dos pacientes, com diminuição de intensidade ao longo do tempo. No entanto, alguns pacientes podem ter disfagia persistente. Objetivo - O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a dinâmica da ingestão de água em pacientes com disfagia persistente após tratamento cirúrgico da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico comparando-os com os pacientes com disfagia causada por acalásia, idiopática ou consequente à doença de Chagas, e controles. Métodos - Trinta e três pacientes com disfagia pós fundoplicatura, que persiste a mais de um ano após a cirurgia, em conjunto com 50 pacientes com doença de Chagas, 27 pacientes com acalásia idiopática, todos com disfagia, e 88 controles foram avaliados pelo teste de ingestão de água. Eles ingeriram, em triplicata e sem pausas, 50 mL de água, o tempo de ingestão foi precisamente cronometrado e contado o número de deglutições necessário para ingerir todo volume. Com estes resultados foram calculados: (a) intervalo entre deglutições - tempo para completar a ingestão dividido pelo número de deglutições; (b) fluxo de ingestão - volume ingerido dividido pelo tempo necessário; (c) volume em cada deglutição - volume ingerido dividido pelo número de deglutições. Resultados - Os pacientes com disfagia pós fundoplicatura, doença de Chagas e acalásia idiopática levaram mais tempo para ingerir todo volume, tiveram maior número de deglutições, maior intervalo entre as deglutições, diminuição do fluxo de ingestão e diminuição no volume de água de cada deglutição em comparação com os controles. Não houve diferença entre os três grupos de pacientes. Não houve correlação entre o tempo após a operação e os resultados. Conclusão - Os pacientes com disfagia pós fundoplicatura tem dinâmica de ingestão de água semelhante aos pacientes com acalasia.

Percepção de sabores em pessoas normais / Flavor perception in healthy volunteers

Introdução: percepção do sabor do alimento ingerido pode ter importante papel na proteção do sistema digestivo. Objetivo: avaliar a capacidade de percepção dos sabores amargo, azedo, doce e neutro em pessoas normais. Método: foram estudados 46 indivíduos saudáveis, 22 homens e 24 mulheres com idades entre 23 e 71 anos, média de 45 anos. Cada sujeito deglutiu, em sequência aleatória, 5 mL de bolos líquidos com 4 sabores: amargo (chá de Peumus boldus), azedo (suco de limão diluído), doce (sacarose diluída) e neutro (água) na temperatura ambiente. Após cada deglutição, os participantes foram questionados sobre o sabor do líquido deglutido. Resultados: não houve diferença na frequência de acertos na identificação dos sabores (amargo: 80%, azedo: 85%, neutro: 89% e doce: 89%). Não houve diferenças relacionadas ao gênero na identificação dos sabores. Cinco indivíduos (25%) entre os jovens (23-39 anos) não identificaram o sabor azedo, o que aconteceu em 2 (8%) dos mais idosos (40-71 anos). Vinte e sete (59%) indivíduos identificaram todos os sabores, 13 (28%) não identificaram um sabor, 5 (11%) não identificaram dois sabores e um indivíduo (2%) não identificou 3 sabores. Conclusão: entre 80% e 90% dos sujeitos da população estudada foram capazes de identificar o gosto do líquido que deglutiu, mas 41% não identificou pelo menos um sabor entre os quatro avaliados.

Introduction: perception of the swallowed bolus taste may have an important role in the protection of the digestive tract. Objective: to evaluate the perception of bitter, sour, sweet and neutral tastes of a liquid bolus in normal individuals. Method: we studied 46 healthy subjects, 22 men and 24 women aged 23 to 71 years, mean 45 years. Each subject swallowed in a random sequence, 5 mL of a liquid bolus with four flavors: bitter (Peumus Boldus tea), sour (limon juice diluted), sweet (sucrose diluted) and neutral (water) all at room temperature. After each swallow the participants were asked about the taste of the liquid swallowed. Results: there was no difference in the frequency of the correct identification of flavors (bitter: 80%, sour: 85%, neutral: 89% and sweet: 89%). There was no gender difference in the flavor identification. Five (25%) of the younger subjects (20-39 years) did not identify the sour taste, what happen in 2 (8%) of older subjects (40-71 years). Twenty-seven (59%) individuals identified all flavors, 13 (28%) did not identify one flavor, 5 (11%) did not identify two flavors and only one individual (2%) did not identify three flavors. Conclusion: between 80% to 90% of the population studied was able to identify the taste of the liquid they swallowed, but 41% did not identify at least one flavor.

Diferenças entre homens e mulheres da mesma altura corporal no teste de ingestão de água / Differences between men and women with the same height in the water swallow test

Introdução: há trabalhos que demonstram que a dinâmica da deglutição é influenciada pelo gênero, o que poderia ser consequente a diferenças anatômicas entre homens e mulheres. Entretanto, estes trabalhos não consideraram o possível efeito da altura corporal dos indivíduos. Nossa hipótese é que as diferenças previamente observadas não devem acontecer quando os indivíduos tiverem idades e alturas semelhantes. Objetivo: avaliar a dinâmica da deglutição de água em homens e mulheres com idades e alturas corporais semelhantes. Método: utilizando o teste de ingestão de água, estudamos 60 voluntários saudáveis, 30 homens [idade: 40,7 (12,9) anos, altura: 1,69 (0,05)m] e 30 mulheres [idade: 37,3 (11,4) anos, altura: 1,68 (0.05)m]. O teste foi realizado com o voluntário sentado, com a ingestão contínua de 50 ml de água, e a medida do tempo de ingestão e contagem do número de deglutições para ingerir todo volume. Com estes resultados, calculamos o intervalo entre deglutições, o fluxo de ingestão e o volume por deglutição. Resultados: o número de deglutições para ingerir todo volume foi, em média, maior nas mulheres [4,3 (1,6)] do que nos homens [3,9 (1,8); p=0,04]. Sendo assim, o volume por deglutição foi menor nas mulheres [13,4 (5,0) ml] do que o volume por deglutição observado nos homens [17,3 (12,5) ml; p=0,04]. Não houve diferença entre os gêneros no tempo de ingestão, no intervalo entre deglutições e no fluxo de ingestão. Conclusão: mulheres ingerem água em menor volume em cada deglutição quando comparadas com homens com idades e alturas corporais semelhantes.

Introduction: there are results reporting that there are differences between men and women in the dynamics of swallowing, which may be consequence of anatomic differences between genders. Objective: to evaluate the dynamics of water ingestion in men and women with similar heights and ages. Our hypothesis was that the differences previously found might not be seen if they have similar age and similar height. Method: we evaluated by the water swallow test the dynamics of water ingestion in 60 healthy volunteers, 30 men [age: 40.7 (12.9) years; height: 1.69 (0.05)m] and 30 women (age: 37.3 (11.4) years; height: 1.68 (0.05) m]. The test was performed with the volunteers in the sitting position. They ingested continuously and confortably 50 ml of water while precisely timed and counted the number of swallows needed to ingest all the volume. Results: The number of swallows to ingest all the volume was greater in women [4.3 (1.6)] than in men [3.9 (1.8); p=0.04]. The volume capacity in each swallow was smaller in women [13.4 (5.0) ml] than in men [17.3 (12.5) ml; p=0.04]. There was no difference in the duration of ingestion, in the time between swallows and in the flux of ingestion. Conclusion: even with similar ages and height women ingest water in smaller volume in each swallow than men.

Effect of a bitter bolus on oral, pharyngeal and esophageal transit of healthy subjects.

CONTEXT: During swallowing, boluses stimulate sensory receptors of the oral, pharyngeal, laryngeal, and esophageal regions. Sweet and tasteless foods are more acceptable for swallowing than bitter foods. A bitter bolus is unpleasant for most subjects. Our hypothesis was that the ingestion of a bitter bolus might alter the oral behavior, pharyngeal and esophageal transit when compared to a sweet bolus. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the bitter taste of a liquid bolus causes alteration on oral, pharyngeal and/or esophageal transit in normal subjects in comparison with sweet bolus.' METHOD: Scintigraphic evaluation of oral, pharyngeal and esophageal transit was performed in 43 asymptomatic subjects, 22 women and 21 men, ages 23-71 years, without problems with the ingestion of liquid and solid foods, and without digestive, cardiac or neurologic diseases. Each subject swallowed in random sequence and at room temperature 5 mL of a liquid bolus with bitter taste, prepared with 50 mL of water with 2 g of leaves of Peumus boldus, heated until boiling (boldus tea), and 5 mL of a liquid bolus with sweet taste, prepared with 50 mL of water with 3 g of sucrose, both labeled with 37 MBq of technetium phytate (Tc99m). RESULTS: There was no difference between the bitter bolus and the sweet bolus in mouth, pharynx and esophageal transit and clearance duration and in the amount of residues. CONCLUSION: A bitter bolus, considered an unpleasant bolus, does not alter the duration of oral, pharyngeal and esophageal phases of swallowing, when compared with a sweet bolus, considered a pleasant bolus.

Effect of a biteer bolus on oral, pharyngeal and esophageal transit of healthy subjetts

Context During swallowing, boluses stimulate sensory receptors of the oral, pharyngeal, laryngeal, and esophageal regions. Sweet and tasteless foods are more acceptable for swallowing than bitter foods. A bitter bolus is unpleasant for most subjects. Our hypothesis was that the ingestion of a bitter bolus might alter the oral behavior, pharyngeal and esophageal transit when compared to a sweet bolus. Objective To evaluate whether the bitter taste of a liquid bolus causes alteration on oral, pharyngeal and/or esophageal transit in normal subjects in comparison with sweet bolus.' Method Scintigraphic evaluation of oral, pharyngeal and esophageal transit was performed in 43 asymptomatic subjects, 22 women and 21 men, ages 23-71 years, without problems with the ingestion of liquid and solid foods, and without digestive, cardiac or neurologic diseases. Each subject swallowed in random sequence and at room temperature 5 mL of a liquid bolus with bitter taste, prepared with 50 mL of water with 2 g of leaves of Peumus boldus, heated until boiling (boldus tea), and 5 mL of a liquid bolus with sweet taste, prepared with 50 mL of water with 3 g of sucrose, both labeled with 37 MBq of technetium phytate (Tc99m). Results There was no difference between the bitter bolus and the sweet bolus in mouth, pharynx and esophageal transit and clearance duration and in the amount of residues. Conclusion A bitter bolus, considered an unpleasant bolus, does not alter the duration of oral, pharyngeal and esophageal phases of swallowing, when compared with a sweet bolus, considered a pleasant bolus. .

Contexto Durante a deglutição o bolo estimula os receptores sensoriais da boca, faringe, laringe e esôfago. Os alimentos doces e sem gosto são mais aceitáveis para a deglutição do que os alimentos amargos, que tem gosto desagradável para a maioria dos indivíduos. A hipótese destes autores era que a ingestão de um bolo amargo pode alterar o trânsito oral, faríngeo e esofágico. Objetivo Avaliar se o gosto amargo de um bolo líquido provoca alteração do trânsito oral, faringeo e/ou esofágico de pessoas normais. Método Avaliação cintilográfica dos trânsitos oral, faringeo e esofágico foi realizada em 43 indivíduos assintomáticos, 22 mulheres e 21 homens, com idades entre 23-71 anos, sem problemas com a ingestão de alimentos líquidos e sólidos, sem doença digestiva, cardíaca ou neurológica. Cada indivíduo ingeriu, em sequência aleatória e na temperatura ambiente, 5 mL de um bolo líquido com sabor amargo, preparado com 2 g de folhas de Peumus boldus em 50 mL de água, aquecidas até a temperatura de fervura (chá de boldo), e 5 mL de um bolo líquido com sabor doce, preparado com 3 g de sacarose em 50 mL de água, ambos marcados com 37 MBq de tecnécio fitato (Tc99m). Resultados Não houve diferença entre o bolo amargo e o bolo doce na duração do trânsito pela boca, faringe e esôfago, e na quantidade de resíduos. Conclusão Um bolo amargo, considerado de sabor desagradável, não altera a duração das fases oral, faríngea e esofágica da deglutição, quando comparado com um bolo doce, considerado como sabor agradável. .

Percepção de sabores em pacientes com acidente vascular encefálico / Taste perception in stroke patients

OBJETIVO: avaliar a percepção dos sabores amargo, azedo, doce e neutro. MÉTODO: foram estudados 36 pacientes com Acidente Vascular Encefálico (AVE) (5 hemorrágicos e 31 isquêmicos) e 30 sujeitos controles. Foi realizada avaliação fonoaudiológica estrutural e funcional incluindo postura, vedamento labial, presença de resíduos, tosse, engasgo, e ausculta cervical. Cada sujeito deglutiu em sequência aleatória 5 mL de líquido com os 4 sabores [chá de boldo (amargo), suco de limão diluído (azedo), sacarose diluída (doce) e água (neutro)] na temperatura ambiente. Entre as deglutições os participantes eram questionados sobre a dificuldade em deglutir e qual o sabor do líquido daquela deglutição. RESULTADOS: entre os pacientes houve maior freqüência de erros na identificação dos sabores amargo (controles: 16,7 por cento, AVE: 47,3 por cento, p=0,01) e azedo (controles: 6,7 por cento, AVE: 27,8 por cento, p=0,05), sem diferenças para o sabores neutro (controles: 10,0 por cento, AVE: 16,7 por cento, p=0,50) e doce (controles: 13,3 por cento, AVE: 16,7 por cento, p=0,80). Os pacientes com AVE tiveram maior dificuldade para deglutir os líquidos do que os controles (p<0,04). CONCLUSÃO: houve maior dificuldade na percepção dos sabores amargo e azedo no grupo com AVE do que nos controles.

PURPOSE: to assess the perception of bitter, sour, sweet and neutral flavors in stroke patients. METHOD: we studied 36 patients with stroke (5 hemorrhagic and 31 ischemic) and had a 30 subjects' control group. W performed a structural and functional oral and pharyngeal evaluation including posture, lip sealing, presence of residues, cough, choking, and cervical auscultation. Five ml of fluids with the 4 flavors ["boldus" tea (bitter), diluted lemon juice (sour), diluted sucrose (sweet), and water (neutral)] were offered in random sequence under room temperature. Participants were questioned, between swallows, on the difficulty in swallowing and which flavor they had just swallowed. RESULTS: patients with stroke had greater difficulty in swallowing the fluids than control group (p<0.04). Patients made more mistakes in identifying bitter (control: 16.7 percent, stroke: 47.3 percent, p=0.01) and sour (control: 6.7 percent, stroke: 27.8 percent, p=0.05) flavors, without differences in the identification of neutral (control: 10.0 percent, stroke: 167 percent, p=0.50) and sweet (control: 13.3 percent, stroke: 16.7 percent, p=0,80). CONCLUSION: the group with stroke had more difficulty in perceiving bitter and sour flavors than the control group subjects.

Possible interaction of gender and age on human swallowing behavior.

CONTEXT: The swallowing behavior is affected by age and possibly by gender. However, the interaction of the effects of age and gender on swallowing is not completely known. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the possibility of interaction of gender and age on human swallowing behavior. METHOD: Swallowing was evaluated in 89 healthy subjects by the water swallowing test, 43 men and 46 women aged 20-40 years (younger, n = 38), 41-60 years (middle-aged, n = 31) and 61-80 years (older, n = 20). Each subject ingested in triplicate 50 mL of water while precisely timed and the number of swallows needed to ingest all the volume was counted. RESULTS: The interval between swallows was shorter and the volume in each swallow was smaller in women compared to men. In older subjects the time to ingest the 50 mL of water was longer, the interval between swallows was longer, and swallowing flow and volume in each swallow were smaller than in younger and middle-aged subjects. The swallowing flow was lower in women compared to men in younger subjects. The volume of each swallow was smaller in women than in men in younger and middle-aged subjects. There was no difference in swallowing flow and volume between older men and older women. CONCLUSION: Age and gender influence swallowing behavior, with the effect of gender being more evident in younger subjects and the effect of age being more evident in men.

Possible interaction of gender and age on human swallowing behavior / Possível interação entre gênero e idade na deglutição

CONTEXT: The swallowing behavior is affected by age and possibly by gender. However, the interaction of the effects of age and gender on swallowing is not completely known. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the possibility of interaction of gender and age on human swallowing behavior. METHOD: Swallowing was evaluated in 89 healthy subjects by the water swallowing test, 43 men and 46 women aged 20-40 years (younger, n = 38), 41-60 years (middle-aged, n = 31) and 61-80 years (older, n = 20). Each subject ingested in triplicate 50 mL of water while precisely timed and the number of swallows needed to ingest all the volume was counted. RESULTS: The interval between swallows was shorter and the volume in each swallow was smaller in women compared to men. In older subjects the time to ingest the 50 mL of water was longer, the interval between swallows was longer, and swallowing flow and volume in each swallow were smaller than in younger and middle-aged subjects. The swallowing flow was lower in women compared to men in younger subjects. The volume of each swallow was smaller in women than in men in younger and middle-aged subjects. There was no difference in swallowing flow and volume between older men and older women. CONCLUSION: Age and gender influence swallowing behavior, with the effect of gender being more evident in younger subjects and the effect of age being more evident in men.

CONTEXTO: Idade e, possivelmente, o gênero afetam a dinâmica da deglutição. Entretanto, a interação entre os efeitos da idade e do gênero na deglutição não é completamente conhecida. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a possível interação da idade e do gênero na dinâmica da deglutição. MÉTODOS: A dinâmica da deglutição foi avaliada pelo teste de ingestão de água em 89 voluntários saudáveis, 43 homens e 46 mulheres, com idades de 20 a 40 anos (jovens, n = 38), 41-60 anos (meia idade, n = 31) e 61 a 80 anos (idosos, n = 20). Cada sujeito ingeriu em triplicata 50 mL de água enquanto eram medidos o tempo de ingestão e o número de deglutições necessárias para ingerir todo volume. RESULTADOS: O intervalo entre deglutições e o volume em cada deglutição foram menores nas mulheres, quando comparadas aos homens. O tempo para ingerir os 50 mL de água foi maior, o intervalo entre deglutições foi maior, o fluxo de ingestão e o volume em cada deglutição foram menores em pessoas idosas quando comparadas com pessoas jovens e de meia idade. O fluxo de ingestão foi menor nas mulheres, comparado ao fluxo dos homens, somente entre os sujeitos jovens. O volume em cada deglutição foi menor nas mulheres do que nos homens entre os sujeitos jovens e de meia idade. Não houve diferença no fluxo de ingestão e no volume em cada deglutição entre homens e mulheres idosos. CONCLUSÃO: Idade e gênero têm influência na deglutição, com o efeito do gênero mais evidente nos sujeitos jovens, e o efeito da idade mais evidente nos homens.

Evaluation of liquid ingestion after bariatric surgery.

CONTEXT: Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for obesity; however, after surgery the patient may have difficulty in swallowing liquid and solid foods. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate liquid ingestion in patients who had undergone bariatric surgery. METHOD: We studied 43 volunteers with normal body mass index (BMI) (BMI: 18.5-24.9 kg/m²), 55 subjects with class III obesity (BMI: >40.0 kg/m²), and 48 subjects with bariatric surgery for treatment of class III obesity. The method chosen for evaluation was the water swallowing test. The subjects drank in triplicate 50 mL of water while being precisely timed and the number of swallows were counted. RESULTS: There was no difference between subjects with normal BMI and subjects with class III obesity. During the first 2 months after bariatric surgery the patients showed an increase in the time needed to drink the entire volume, in the number of swallows, and in the inter-swallow interval, and a decrease in the volume swallowing capacity (volume/swallowing) and swallowing flow rate (volume swallowed/second). After 2 months, the results of the swallowing measurements moved in the direction of normal values. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery may cause more intense alterations of liquid bolus swallowing within 2 months after the procedure, which moved to normal values after this time.

Evaluation of liquid ingestion after bariatric surgery / Avaliação da ingestão de líquido após cirurgia bariátrica

CONTEXT: Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for obesity; however, after surgery the patient may have difficulty in swallowing liquid and solid foods. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate liquid ingestion in patients who had undergone bariatric surgery. METHOD: We studied 43 volunteers with normal body mass index (BMI) (BMI: 18.5-24.9 kg/m²), 55 subjects with class III obesity (BMI: >40.0 kg/m²), and 48 subjects with bariatric surgery for treatment of class III obesity. The method chosen for evaluation was the water swallowing test. The subjects drank in triplicate 50 mL of water while being precisely timed and the number of swallows were counted. RESULTS: There was no difference between subjects with normal BMI and subjects with class III obesity. During the first 2 months after bariatric surgery the patients showed an increase in the time needed to drink the entire volume, in the number of swallows, and in the inter-swallow interval, and a decrease in the volume swallowing capacity (volume/swallowing) and swallowing flow rate (volume swallowed/second). After 2 months, the results of the swallowing measurements moved in the direction of normal values. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery may cause more intense alterations of liquid bolus swallowing within 2 months after the procedure, which moved to normal values after this time.

CONTEXTO: Cirurgia bariátrica é tratamento efetivo para a obesidade. Após a operação o paciente pode ter dificuldade em ingerir alimentos líquidos e sólidos. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a ingestão de líquido em pacientes submetidos a cirurgia bariátrica. MÉTODOS: Estudaram-se 43 voluntários com índice de massa corporal (IMC) normal (18,9 - 24,5 kg/m²), 55 sujeitos com obesidade classe III (IMC: >40.6 kg/m²), e 48 sujeitos que haviam sido submetidos a cirurgia bariátrica para tratamento de obesidade classe III. Utilizou-se na avaliação o teste de deglutição de água. Os sujeitos ingeriram 50 mL de água enquanto o tempo de ingestão era medido e contado o número de deglutições. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença entre os sujeitos com IMC normal e pacientes com obesidade classe III. No grupo de pacientes avaliados até 2 meses após a operação os pacientes tinham, em média, aumento do tempo para ingerir todo volume de água, no número de deglutições, e no intervalo entre deglutições, e diminuição do volume em cada deglutição e do fluxo de ingestão. Após 2 meses as medidas tiveram tendência a se aproximar dos valores encontrados nos sujeitos não operados. CONCLUSÃO: Cirurgia bariátrica pode provocar alterações na deglutição de líquidos nos primeiros 2 meses após o procedimento, tendendo a se aproximar dos valores normais após este período.

Effect of age on proximal esophageal response to swallowing / Influência da idade na resposta do esôfago proximal à deglutição

CONTEXT: It has been demonstrated that the ageing process affects esophageal motility. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of the age on the proximal esophageal response to wet swallows. METHOD: We measured the proximal esophageal response to swallows of a 5 mL bolus of water in 69 healthy volunteers, 20 of them aged 18-30 years (group I), 27 aged 31-50 years (group II), and 22 aged 51-74 years (group III). We used the manometric method with continuous perfusion. The proximal esophageal contractions were recorded 5 cm from a pharyngeal recording site located 1 cm above the upper esophageal sphincter. The time between the onset of the pharyngeal and of the proximal esophageal recording (pharyngeal-esophageal time) and the amplitude, duration and area under the curve of the proximal esophageal contraction were measured. RESULTS: The pharyngeal-esophageal time was shorter in group I subjects than in group II and III subjects (P<0.05). The duration of proximal esophageal contractions was longer in group I than in groups II and III (P<0.001). There was no differences between groups in the amplitude or area under the curve of contractions. There were no differences between groups II and III for any of the measurements. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the age may affects the response of the proximal esophagus to wet swallows.

CONTEXTO: O processo natural de envelhecimento altera a motilidade do esôfago. OBJETIVO: Estudar o efeito da idade na resposta da parte proximal do esôfago à deglutição de água. MÉTODO: Mediu-se a resposta do esôfago proximal à deglutição de 5 mL de água em 69 voluntários saudáveis, 20 com idades de 18 a 30 anos (grupo I), 27 com idades de 31 a 50 anos (grupo II) e 22 com idades de 51 a 74 anos (grupo III). Utilizamos o método manométrico com perfusão contínua. As contrações do esôfago proximal foram medidas 5 cm distal a um registro das contrações em faringe, localizado 1 cm acima do esfíncter superior do esôfago. Foram medidos o tempo entre o início da contração em faringe e o início da contração em esôfago proximal (tempo faringoesofágico), e a amplitude, duração e área sob a curva da contração proximal. RESULTADOS: O tempo faringoesofágico teve menor duração nos sujeitos do grupo I do que naqueles dos grupos II e III (P<0,05). A duração da contração em esôfago proximal foi maior nos sujeitos do grupo I do que naqueles dos grupos II e III (P<0,001). Não houve diferenças entre os grupos na amplitude e na área sob a curva das contrações, e não houve diferenças entre os grupos II e III em todas as medidas. CONCLUSÃO: Observou-se que a idade pode alterar a resposta do esôfago proximal à deglutição de água.

Effect of age on proximal esophageal response to swallowing.

CONTEXT: It has been demonstrated that the ageing process affects esophageal motility. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of the age on the proximal esophageal response to wet swallows. METHOD: We measured the proximal esophageal response to swallows of a 5 mL bolus of water in 69 healthy volunteers, 20 of them aged 18-30 years (group I), 27 aged 31-50 years (group II), and 22 aged 51-74 years (group III). We used the manometric method with continuous perfusion. The proximal esophageal contractions were recorded 5 cm from a pharyngeal recording site located 1 cm above the upper esophageal sphincter. The time between the onset of the pharyngeal and of the proximal esophageal recording (pharyngeal-esophageal time) and the amplitude, duration and area under the curve of the proximal esophageal contraction were measured. RESULTS: The pharyngeal-esophageal time was shorter in group I subjects than in group II and III subjects (P<0.05). The duration of proximal esophageal contractions was longer in group I than in groups II and III (P<0.001). There was no differences between groups in the amplitude or area under the curve of contractions. There were no differences between groups II and III for any of the measurements. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the age may affects the response of the proximal esophagus to wet swallows.

Gender differences in proximal esophageal contractions / Influência do gênero nas contrações do esôfago proximal

Context: There are reports showing that gender has an influence on swallowing and on the contractions of the distal esophageal body. Objective: In this investigation we studied the effect of gender on proximal esophageal contraction. Methods: We studied 20 men (22-68 years old, median 39 years) and 44 women (18-61 years old, median 41 years) without symptoms and without gastrointestinal or respiratory diseases. We measured the time interval between the onset of pharyngeal contraction 1 cm proximal to the upper esophageal sphincter and the onset of the proximal esophageal contraction 5 cm from the pharyngeal recording. We also measured the amplitude, duration and area under the curve of the proximal esophageal contractions. The recording was performed by the manometric method with continuous perfusion. The contractions were recorded in duplicate after swallows of a 5 mL bolus of water. Results: There were no differences between men and women in the interval between the onset of pharyngeal and of esophageal contractions or in the amplitude of esophageal contractions. The duration of contractions was longer in women (2.35 ± 0.60 s) than in men (2.07 ± 0.62 s) but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.087). The area under the curve of the esophageal contraction was higher in women (130.2 ± 55.2 mm Hg x s) than in men (97.4 ± 49.4 mm Hg x s, P = 0.026). Conclusion: We conclude that there is a difference between men and women in the proximal esophageal contractions in response to wet swallows, although this difference is of no clinical relevance.

Contexto: Há trabalhos que demonstram a existência de diferenças entre homens e mulheres na deglutição e nas contrações em parte distal do esôfago. Objetivo: Neste trabalho estuda-se a influência do gênero nas contrações em parte proximal do esôfago de pessoas assintomáticas. Método: Incluíram-se 20 homens (22-68 anos, mediana 39 anos) e 44 mulheres (18-61 anos, mediana 41 anos) sem doenças gastrointestinais, neurológicas ou respiratórias. Mediu-se o intervalo de tempo entre o início da contração em faringe 1 cm proximal ao esfíncter superior do esôfago e o início da contração em esôfago proximal 5 cm distal ao registro da faringe, e a amplitude, duração e área sob a curva da contração esofágica proximal. Utilizou-se o método manométrico com perfusão contínua. As contrações foram registradas em duplicata após a deglutição de 5 mL de água. Resultados: Não se observaram diferenças entre homens e mulheres no intervalo entre a contração da faringe e do esôfago proximal, e na amplitude da contração do esôfago. A duração da contração foi maior nas mulheres (2,35 ± 0,60 s) do que nos homens (2,07 ± 0,62 s) mas o resultado não atingiu significância estatística (P = 0,087). A área sob a curva das contrações esofágicas foi maior nas mulheres (130,2 ± 55,2 mm Hg x s) do que nos homens (97,4 ± 49,4 mm Hg x s, P = 0,026). Conclusão: Observou-se que há diferença entre homens e mulheres nas contrações em esôfago proximal quando da deglutição de água, o que não deve ter importância clínica.